Industries

Managed AI for Columbus Contractors and Field Service Companies

The office paperwork in a contracting business tends to get done after the phones stop. The daily report is not written, two RFIs have sat since Friday because nobody had ten minutes to read the spec section, and Thursday’s bid still has a blank scope letter. The person who has to write that scope letter is the same person who answers the phone at 8 a.m. when a rooftop unit goes down. ScaleSight AI runs one managed AI workspace for contractors and field service companies across Central Ohio, aimed at that paperwork.

Where it starts

The recurring work worth handing over first

Not the impressive demo. The jobs that come up every week and eat somebody’s afternoon, which is where the hours actually come back.

Scope letters and bid inclusions

Feed in the invitation to bid, the spec sections that touch your scope, and the addenda. A template returns a first-pass inclusions and exclusions list in your own scope letter format, with the spec paragraph cited beside each line. The estimator reads, corrects and prices. The reading is already done.

RFI drafting from a field question

A superintendent’s photo and texted question, plus the drawing sheet it references, come back as a drafted RFI in your numbering and your format, with the sheet number and spec reference filled in. The project manager checks it and sends it. Nobody starts at a blank form at the end of the day.

Change order justification packages

Pulls the RFI thread, the field ticket, the dated correspondence and the original scope language into one narrative in date order, so the request explains itself to the owner’s rep before anyone has to defend it in a meeting. The pricing stays yours.

Daily reports and job logs

A voice note from the truck becomes a structured log entry with manpower, weather, deliveries, delays and site visitors in the fields your form already uses. The log gets drafted while the day is still fresh, and the superintendent edits what is there.

Submittal review against the spec

Compares submitted product data against the spec section it answers and returns a list of where it deviates, with the paragraph cited. The project manager reviews a short list of differences instead of reading two documents side by side, and certifies compliance before it goes to the architect or engineer for final action.

Service call follow-up and warranty correspondence

Turns a tech’s completion notes into the customer-facing summary, in your company’s wording. The coordinator decides what is covered and what any recommended work should cost, and the draft explains that call rather than making it. The coordinator edits and sends, so the follow-up becomes a short review.

Is this just another login nobody in the office will use?

That is the right question to ask first. Most offices have already bought software that was going to fix the paperwork and ended up as one more tab open on the estimator’s second monitor. AI can fail the same way, and it fails faster, because a draft somebody has to rewrite from scratch costs more time than writing it once.

So the test we hold work to is whether it removes a step from a job the office already does. A workflow that adds a form, a field, or a standing meeting has failed that test and gets pulled. If a daily log template does not get the log written faster than typing it into the form, it gets rebuilt or dropped, and we would rather hear that in the first month than a year in.

The office already knows which parts of the day are wasted. What they have not had is a way to try a fix on a Tuesday without a budget conversation and a vendor call. In a year, the best AI ideas in your company should come from your people, not from us.

Where does this actually save time during bid week?

Most of bid week is reading. Somebody has to get through the invitation to bid, the spec sections that touch your scope, the front-end conditions, and the addendum that landed Tuesday afternoon, and then write a scope letter that states exactly what you are carrying and what you are excluding. That reading happens after hours because the phone stops then.

A workspace template takes those documents and returns a first-pass inclusions and exclusions list in your own scope letter format, with the spec paragraph cited beside each line. Your estimator reviews a draft against the documents instead of building one from a blank page. Pricing, judgment, and what you choose to exclude stay with the estimator, because that is where your margin lives.

The same mechanism handles addenda. An addendum that changes a few sentences across a long spec set comes back as those sentences with the pages named, so the check is a short read and not a second pass through the whole set. None of that decides the number you submit. It shortens the distance between opening the documents and being able to think about them.

What should we keep AI out of?

Some of this work should not go near an AI tool, and saying so up front is part of the setup. Contract terms, Ohio lien deadlines and notice provisions get read by your attorney. Stamped engineering stays with the engineer. A submittal you review and pass along carries your certification and your name, so that judgment stays with your project manager. Safety incident facts get written by the person who was standing there.

The larger exposure is confidentiality. Owner-provided documents often arrive under an NDA, geotechnical reports and model files included, and bid confidentiality clauses restrict what leaves your office. Your labor productivity assumptions and your pricing history are the two things a competitor would most want to read. Nothing stops an estimator from pasting that material into a chatbot account opened with a personal email address, and nobody in the company would see it happen.

The workspace answers that at two levels. Company AI use sits in one place with an owner and a record, so you can see what is being used and by whom instead of guessing across private accounts. And anything built on your documents, your pricing or your specific process stays inside your workspace and is never shared with another client.

ScaleSight AI runs on a SOC 2 Type II audited platform. The other half of that question, who can reach the file server and what leaves it, sits with TTS Cyber, the managed IT and cybersecurity company in the same Columbus office and the same Koine Cyber group.

Most of our payroll never opens a laptop. What are we paying for?

Seats are per person, and you buy them only for the people who would open the workspace. In a contracting business that is usually the office: estimating, project management, service coordination, safety and admin. If a superintendent would use it daily, that is a seat. If not, the information goes to a coordinator who has one, which is how that paperwork already moves, so your seat count follows the office and not the payroll.

The managed service is priced per seat plus usage. Every seat comes with a monthly usage allowance, and nothing is spent past the ceiling you put on the account, so a heavy bid month cannot produce a bill you did not plan for. Published budget ranges are monthly totals by seat count: up to 10 seats runs $250 to $500, 10 to 25 seats runs $500 to $1,175, and 25 to 100 seats runs $1,175 to $3,800. A $250 monthly minimum applies, and no per-seat rate is published.

Budget is allocated by team and department, never person by person. Estimating gets an allowance sized to bid volume, service coordination gets one sized to call volume, and it moves when the work moves. We also report back what kinds of work AI is being used for across the company, so a quarter in you can see whether it is going into scope letters and service follow-ups or somewhere you would want to steer it. Those are the two controls that let you leave this running: you decide what it can cost, and you can see what it is used for.

Why not just put ChatGPT or Copilot on the office computers?

You can, and that is where most offices start. Two things happen afterward. The first is that whatever your estimator builds sits on one AI company’s model and one AI company’s pricing. When that price moves or that model is retired, the work gets rebuilt on your time. Inside the workspace we re-point the same template at a different model and it keeps running, so what you paid to build stays built.

The second is that no single company is best at every task. Reading a long spec set, pulling live pricing off a manufacturer’s site, marking up an image, and drafting a run of short service follow-ups are four different jobs, and the strongest model for each is a different one. Each job is routed to whichever model handles it best, and the user never has to know which one they are using.

Then there is what you inherit. Work that is identical from one business to the next is built once and given to every client, so a company that starts in March gets everything built before March, and new templates, agents and workflows ship into your workspace every month out of that shared library. Anything built on your own documents, your own data or your own specific process stays in your workspace and is never shared.

The part that compounds fastest is internal. When one project manager works out a way to summarize a submittal log that holds up on a call with the architect, that method becomes a template every project manager in the company can run. When you need something specific enough that no template covers it, an AI Build Project is scoped work with a start date and an end date that builds that one workflow, template or agent and then ends.

Questions

Asked by construction & field services businesses

Do the people in the field need seats?

You only need seats for the people who would actually open the workspace, which in a contracting business is usually the office rather than the field. Seats are per person, so estimating, project management, service coordination, safety and admin account for most of them. A superintendent who needs a daily log written can send the information to a coordinator who has a seat, which is how that paperwork already moves. Your seat count follows the office, not the payroll.

What does it cost?

Pricing is per seat plus usage, and the published budget ranges are monthly totals by seat count: up to 10 seats is $250 to $500, 10 to 25 seats is $500 to $1,175, and 25 to 100 seats is $1,175 to $3,800. Each seat carries a monthly usage allowance and you set a ceiling on total spend. A $250 monthly minimum applies. Budget is allocated by team and department, never per individual.

Could our bid pricing or job documents end up helping another contractor?

Anything built on your documents, your pricing or your specific process stays inside your workspace and is never shared with another client. What is shared across clients is only the work that is identical in every business, such as a meeting notes workflow or a proposal formatter, which is built once and given to everyone. ScaleSight AI runs on a SOC 2 Type II audited platform.

What happens if the AI company raises prices or retires the model we built on?

ScaleSight re-points the workflow at a different model and it keeps running. Anything built directly on one AI company’s model is a bet on that company’s pricing, so when the price moves or the model is retired, that work gets rebuilt. Because your templates and agents live in the workspace and not inside one vendor’s account, the switch is a configuration change on our side and your people see no difference.

Can you just build us one specific thing instead of the whole program?

An AI Build Project is scoped work with a start date and an end date that builds one specific workflow, template or agent, and you can buy it on its own. A change order package assembler or a scope letter builder would each be one project. It ends when the thing works and your people are using it. It can run with or without the ongoing managed service.

All questions

Tell us what your week actually looks like.

The readiness review starts by finding where AI is already being used in your company, what it is costing, and which recurring work is worth handing over first. You keep the findings either way.